In this scenario, there are two enable signals, say:

They are sequential — meaning aen2 is supposed to go high shortly after aen1, so that data moves smoothly through a two-stage pipeline.

However, both aen1 and aen2 are being:

Each signal therefore passes through its own synchronizer into the receiving domain.

The core timing hazard:

Because of clock phase differences and slight timing skew between aen1 and aen2, there can be a tiny gap where:

If the receiving clock edge happens right in that small window, the destination logic will see both signals low for one cycle — effectively breaking the enable chain.

➡️ The result:
A one-cycle bubble forms in the data pipeline — the data meant for the second stage (a2) is missed or delayed.


✅ The Solution — Consolidation + Extra Flip-Flop

To prevent that “gap” condition, the safest and simplest method is:

1. Send only one control signal across the CDC boundary

2. Regenerate the second (phase-shifted) signal locally

In other words:

// In receiving clock domain 
always @(posedge dest_clk) begin
     aen1_d <= sync_aen1;  // One-cycle delayed copy 
 end  
 assign aen2 = aen1_d;  // Second enable derived locally

Now both aen1 and aen2 are perfectly aligned to the same destination clock, so there’s no risk of a missing cycle.


🧠 Why This Works


🏗️ Practical Example

Logic to generate proper sequencing signals in the new clock domains.jpg


💡 Key Takeaway

Always synchronize one control signal per timing event, and generate any required sequential or delayed control phases locally within the destination domain.

This principle not only prevents missing cycles but also greatly simplifies verification and timing closure.